Decision making course of deontological ethics is criteria for creating options which are morally needed and getting rid of those which are morally not allowed. It’s a philosophical idea which guides individuals on what they should do so as to live better in the community. On the contrary to this is the consequentialist philosophy.
Deontological Ethics Explained
This kind of ethics is a hypothesis of morality that is based on non-consequentialist perception of individual as well as moral choice making. The word deontology is derived from the word “duty” in Greek. As a result, deontological ethics keeps those actions which are not warranted by their results. Instead, factors aside from good results know the excellence and perfection of actions. Not like utilitarianism, wherein the end justifies the mean, this ethics debates that the means are the most significant.
This kind of ethics is stuck in Categorical Imperative that was first made by Immanuel Kant; a German philosopher in his 1785 book entitles Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. This Categorical Imperative just declares the “Act as the maxim of the deed was to turn by they will a general rule of nature. Do you want to allow everyone to adopt this action? If your answer is yes, then your act is moral. On the other hand if your answer is no, your act is not moral. As a whole, your internal responds are more showing than your outward careers once you flip the good acts back on yourselves.
Impact of Deontological Decision Making Process
Even if this Categorical Imperative is incredibly the same to what you call Golden Rule of religions such as Judaism, Christianity and many more, generally speaking Deontologism rejects any ethical theory that grounded in an absolute and higher fact. The deontological ethics as a matter of fact is a duty based principle of objective, naturalistic, morality which somehow connects and transcends the subjective actualities of every person in the society. On the other hand, the main question here is that, is this really works?
Doctor Joel Marks is the newest academics and researcher of this deontological ethics to declare publicly that there is no disparity between good and bad. As a matter of fact as a researcher at Yale University in Interdisciplinary Center for Bioethics now truthfully believe the fundamentalists of religious are correct, with no God, there’s no morality. On the other hand they are not correct, he still believe about the presence of God. Hence Mark believes there’s no morality. Being an atheist and naturalist, he utilized to focus on the deontological perception of morality. Supposedly, this perception doesn’t need God in order to know between good and bad. On the other hand, at this point in time, Marks keeps that the idea of this ethics is only as difficult to deal with as believing in Divine.
In deontological ethics decision making process, person just act in accordance to which maxim by which he or she can, whilst, will that it must become a general rule. Act in order that you take care of humanity.