The directive decision making style presents its own array of strengths and weaknesses. It can be extremely beneficial to an individual to know how their manner of making key decisions would be defined. In order for a person to accomplish this, they must do two things. They need to have a clear understanding of what the directive decision making style entails. They will then need to take that understanding and compare it to some of the other decision making styles.
By comparing and contrasting the directive decision making style with other decision making styles, a person will eventually come to one of two conclusions. They will either decide that their decision-making process does indeed reflect the accepted definition of the directive decision making style, or they will find that their style is better matched to another defined style type.
Comparing and Contrasting The Directive Decision Making Style
If someone has a mindset that loathes vagueness, demanding clear-cut answers and concrete solutions, they are well on their way to being someone who would identify with the directive decision making style. This is a person who believes in efficiency, rationality, and applying cool, level-headed logic to every decision they are required to make. Their mind will consistently be geared towards making quick decisions with strong short-term implications. It is rare for someone who consistently utilizes the directive decision making style to look at alternative possibilities to the decision they have made.
That is pretty much what it means to be someone who uses that particular style. It is different in a number of ways from the three other significant decision-making styles:
Analytic decision making style: This decision making style provides a stark contrast to the directive approach. These are individuals who are capable of working with ambiguity, consider all potential options, and prefer to have a detailed comprehension of the situation at hand.
Conceptual decision making style: This is decision making process that looks towards the long-term implications of their decision. They are going to also take into account as many potential outcomes as possible before rendering a decision.
Behavioral decision making style: Someone who identifies with this style is going to be someone who is capable of working well with peers, believes in the good that can come out of suggestions from others, and takes into account the achievements of the overall team.
Again, all of these decision making styles come with their own strengths and weaknesses. Combinations are also a possibility.