Servant Leadership is a leadership theory 1st promoted by Robert Greenleaf in his 1970 essay. It has evolved into 1 of the speediest growing trends in management and leadership circles. This bases its general purpose and concept as by changing the leadership culture to make the maximum quantity of positive changes. Many non-profit associations, small businesses, firms and corporations tend to get all the advantages of servant leadership. However, there are still disadvantages present in this servant leadership. This leadership philosophy has been prominent in early 21st century businesses. Typically, this means the leader of an organization leads by example and provides direct support to his subordinates.
With regard to the management setting, this signifies the manager of a department or a work group delegates tasks to them and then provides direct support including gathering supplies, research and running errands. Even if this seems like a worthwhile management approach, critics point out some disadvantages. The drawbacks of this kind are far between and few. Hence, the primary drawback is the time it takes to enforce this philosophy. Commonly, an entire group has to a make a pattern shift toward bringing servant leadership. It begins at the top, but all throughout the group, the change and innovation have to be made naturally.
Adoption of Servant Leadership
If a particular group or certain organizations adopt servant leadership from the outset, this is much easier by building up a servant attitude within the management and org. This kind of philosophy adopts higher purposes compared to likely making profits out of it. These servant leaders are trying to build up effective and efficient groups around themselves for a sense of security and stability. If you actually want to make changes to your life and earn a lot of money that is beyond your imagination, you should join an organization that was founded on the servant leadership principles. Such individuals have a natural inclination to serve and a conscious choice merely inspires them to lead.
Comparison Between Leadership Type
Hence, this is a sharp disparity to the typical leaders who aspire to assuage an unusual power drive, to lead or to acquire material possessions. There are many writers that reinforced the servant leadership theory such as Stephen Covey, Ken Blanchard and Peter Senge. There are 10 primary characteristics present in this philosophy including empathy, listening, and awareness, healing relationships along with conceptualization, persuasion, commitment to human resource development, stewardship, foresight and commitment to building a community. In contrary, the general strong point of servant leadership philosophy is its contribution to many organizational and management developments.
The servant leader turns from the common leadership style of telling subordinates what to do and dominating them and rather motivates them to perform and empowers subordinates. This servant leadership functions proactively for setting the way and inspiring the followers to do the same thing.
Such inspiration and dedication lead to collective efforts and the result of which becomes more than the total of individual efforts. In summary, servant leadership has its own strengths and weaknesses to develop business management.